Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffice congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

These days, the majority of big cities face traffic jam issues. Public debate has been going on over whether the government should allocate financial resources to alternative transport
instead
of terrestrial. Some people assert that public money should be spent on train and subway lines,
whereas
many others argue that investing in road enlargement is a good idea. I tend to believe that the former idea is better for the following reasons. Three main factors support the idea that building underground lines can bring benefits to the population. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that the subway does not face traffic congestion and it runs on time. What I mean by
this
is that the users can trust its timetable.
Secondly
, one main positive is the cost of maintenance of lines and trains is reduced
by comparison
with public buses and roads.
That is
to say, the initial investment is high but the savings are worth with over time. The third reason for my belief is that
this
kind of transportation improves the mobility of the town. Take London Underground as an example. The people who live in London are well-served,
hence
the movement in
this
metropolis sharply increases consumerism, which helps the local economy as people feel incentivized to go out and enjoy local attractions. I admit that investments to build more roads and enlargement bring benefits but for a small number of car owners. Despite that, if public transportation runs properly, not only the number of cars on the streets is reduced, but
also
the environmental impact. In conclusion, I would argue that authorities should allocate public money to trains and underground transportation.
Accordingly
, it is generally advisable for the government to work on these projects in a more beneficial way for the population.
Submitted by pollyannamsouza on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • traffic congestion
  • public transportation
  • infrastructure
  • sustainable development
  • induced demand
  • urban planning
  • ecological footprint
  • car dependency
  • mass transit
  • connectivity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: