Some people think that government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that government should invest more money in teaching

science

than other subjects to help a

country

develop and progress. In my opinion, the government should put

science

on top of all subjects,

while

other disciplines may not less important and need to be considered as a second priority based on the needs. Plenty of research and practices say that

science

plays a significant role in advancing some leading

countries

worldwide. Manufacture Engineering was an example of applied

science

that could help some

countries

develop.

For instance

, Japan is currently leading in that subject as an advanced

country

. Global brands and profound manufacturers

such

as Honda, Toyota, Suzuki and Mitsubishi were founded in Japan. No wonder the manufacturing industry is the backbone of

this

country

's economy. Without a doubt,

science

may be critical for some

countries

to gain much income, but others may

also

help in different fields. Communication was one topic outside the

science

subject that could contribute to the

countries

liaising with other counterparts outside the nation. I firmly believe having some best communication experts can increase the possibility for the

country

to achieve some bilateral agreements and business that benefits them. Indonesia is one

country

which has top-notch negotiating skills. One of the deals they conducted

finally

landed them into a promising agreement to help its Capital City extend its rapid mass transportation projects. In conclusion, in developing

countries

, we should not only rely on

science

subjects but

also

consider another discipline so that both of them would complete each other and

finally

, create an impact.