In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is important to consider the surge of fast trains between cities in recent times. Many believe that the budget allocated for these lines would rather be more beneficial in improvising the existing transport facilities, others argue that
such
an initiative would be more righteous in the longer run. In
this
essay, I would like to provide my views on both but support the claim towards the latter. On one hand, constant maintenance of existing facilities especially in a local community will provide a major advantage to the general public.
This
is because numerous citizens prefer to use private vehicles
due to
the lack of proper maintenance to their public counterparts eventually rupturing the quality of rides. Thereby, an increase in the public's preference towards privately owned vehicles would drastically grow the traffic and ultimately the air pollution.
As a result
, upgrading the available public facility would significantly help the community to make the corresponding transition.
On the other hand
, having constant commutation services like speed caravans between two metropolises will have a huge impact on job goers.
This
is
due to
the fact that employees from other cities can rather travel on speed track on a daily basis over entirely relocating there.
Furthermore
, building new railway lines
also
provide multiple options to fellow citizens for leisure and shopping purposes over being entirely dependent on their own locality. In conclusion,
although
there are a plethora of monetary ideas that can improve the existing public facility, the option to rather construct additional railway lines to accommodate faster trains between cities can provide more advantages as outlined above with corresponding examples.
Submitted by praveen9952 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: