Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information , such as their hobbies and interests , and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful . Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opnions.

Bosses are likely to inquire employees about some private information in their

job

application, namely, their recreational activities and tendencies, and whether they are couple or alone. Some supporters agree that

this

information may be related and practical,

while

others do not agree with

this

statement. I believe that

although

identifying private status may be familiar to employees, without

this

profile is still able to assess staff’s capability. Proponents think that having personal information can let an owner of a company can easily acquaint themselves with their new workers.

This

is because employers can establish rapport by understanding their attendants’ preferences.

Due to

this

reason, a newly hired hand may be quick to mingle with their supervisors and colleagues. As an illustration, in Taiwan, most interviewers are required to fill in their marital status in their resume, so recruiters are able to notice their situation and assist them in balancing their life and work so as to maintain a good relationship in the workplace.

However

,

although

this

is a possible method for the personnel department to build a friendship with staff,

this

should not be the prime concern to evaluate a potential candidate’s ability. The majority of the interviewees should be examined by their professional

skills

rather than their individual leisure.

That is

to say. The reason why a company hires a new employee is to search for suitable workers with relevant work experience so as to fill in the position quickly.

Hence

, the company should emphasize

job

hunters’ hard and soft

skills

instead

of their personal recreation because

this

is the dominant reason for contributing to good profits for a corporation. To cite an example, in Japan, their firms only concentrate on their required abilities for their

job

seekers in order to find perfect assistants to fit into their vacant spots as soon as possible.

Therefore

, I believe

this

is an efficient way to save costs to train a new helper on probation. In conclusion,

while

owning the jobholders’ private status is able to bond with them easily, I think testing a potential worker’s communication

skills

or editorial

skills

is more likely to make sure whether the staff are competent at the available

job

position.