Nowadays, wealthy states provide financial support to third-world countries,
however
, it does not play any role Linking Words
to solve
poverty. So, there should be ensured other types of aid to the weak nations. Personally, I partially agree with the following view. In the paragraphs Change preposition
in solving
underneath
, Rephrase
below
this
essay shall Linking Words
see
my thoughts.
Verb problem
show
To begin
with, poor nations have corruption and fund does not reach the needy. The government authority eats all the cash away and the public stays without any help. Linking Words
For example
, the USA invested to India 500 million dollars after the tsunami, but, the populace did not get any help from the political authority. Linking Words
Secondly
, other types of help can be shown and exactly reached the destination. Linking Words
Moreover
, the ministry cannot corrupt it, because it is useless for them. To illustrate, after earthquakes in Turkey and Syria, other regions started to help by giving clothes, food and medicine. Linking Words
As a result
, all support reached the needy.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, cash is the universal type of succour. The ministers will choose what to do with the bill and use it for the needy. Linking Words
For instance
, when Kazakhstan took independence, other states invested 4 billion dollars. Linking Words
Therefore
the authority spent it on the development of the country Linking Words
Furthermore
, if developed people invest in school equipment Linking Words
such
as desks, and boards; it requires an aeroplane for transport. To give an example, if the country needed in schools than hospitals, they would build new schools for invested cash.
In conclusion, Linking Words
this
essay argues that money is not the only way to support third-world countries. To my mind, financial aid is not the best way and it may be eaten away.Linking Words
Deadline 8th April IELTS