Increasing the price of the petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. What the extent do you agree or disagree

Imposing a higher price on

petrol

is believed to be the most effective alternative in reducing gridlock and issues related to pollution.

While

I agree that

this

measure is beneficial, I suppose that there are a number of better contributors.

To begin

with, the option to raise

petrol

cost is considered for several reasons.

Firstly

,

this

method may encourage a larger number of commuters to experience public transport

instead

of their private cars. In

this

way, the environment would avoid a significant amount of smog, which comes out from travellers’ engines.

Also

, the roads reduce the movement pressure.

Secondly

, the demand for

this

energy might decline remarkably.

Therefore

, The air corruption problem will be comforted.

For instance

, the

petrol

increase three months ago in Vietnam brought about a dramatic decrease of

consuming

Verb problem

apply

show examples

petrol

because of the peak cost of

this

energy.

However

, I firmly claim that there are other solutions which need applying. One of the foremost ways is that the government should

create

Verb problem

apply

show examples

control the wastewater

that roots

Wrong verb form

rooted

show examples

in local factories since

this

substance is the score factor of pollution and a variety of severe diseases.

Moreover

, public transportation ought to be concerned with prior use. In fact, in many big cities,

this

way of moving has still been a vital choice to tackle stuck problems and infection as well. To draw a conclusion, in spite of the advantages of boosting

petrol

expenditure in improving traffic and environmental problems, I strongly argue that

such

an approach is not the most effective.