Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The criminal
record
Use synonyms
of the accused in Britain or Australia is secured.
Due to
Linking Words
certain important data coming from an existing
record
Use synonyms
of the accused, some legal experts are pressing for the
jury
Use synonyms
to have access to the particular data before making a decision.
Therefore
Linking Words
, I strongly agree because of several considerations in which a person’s criminal history can be helpful during the sentencing phase and yet, it
also
Linking Words
affects the judgment of a
jury
Use synonyms
.
Firstly
Linking Words
, getting access to a defendant’s past criminal
record
Use synonyms
can be highly relevant for juries to have broadened view of a defendant to consider whether he is guilty or not.
For example
Linking Words
, there will be evidence for a defendant who has previously been convicted of a murder where he tied a victim hastily, and it is related to the current case when the victim was
also
Linking Words
tied in the same way.
Then
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
past information aids the
jury
Use synonyms
to deliver their judgment.
Thus
Linking Words
, with the help of past facts, it could open more direction in solving cases, especially cases where they get stuck on.
In contrast
Linking Words
, hiding the defendant’s prior data can prevent juries from being unduly swayed by it
hence
Linking Words
they will focus more on the evidence relating to the present case. The reason is that some records cannot be proof for defendants committed whatever crime they are now accused of.
Therefore
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
will make many more innocent people safe from being wrongfully convicted.
To conclude
Linking Words
, I agree with a
jury
Use synonyms
should brief on the past criminal
record
Use synonyms
of the defendant but only in some cases, and in terms of fairness, a
jury
Use synonyms
should not get the records.
Submitted by farahhuzaimee on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: