Nuclear energy is a better energy source for countries to meet the ever-increasing energy demand. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, power
becomes
Wrong verb form
has become
show examples
one of the biggest problems which numerous governments need to deal with. Typically
among
Change preposition
apply
show examples
them
Correct pronoun usage
apply
show examples
, nuclear is a good solution to adapt to ever-increasing electric demand. In my opinion, I agree with
this
due to
its dramatic benefits
such
as productivity or refreshment. On the one hand,
this
source may supply humans with a large number of kWh per year
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and has significantly contributed to the productivity of the national electric system.
Moreover
, using nuclear energy
also
helps reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and does not have a pessimistic impact on the local environment. Another interesting is that
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
several scientists propose that
this
one will turn into the main fuel which will supply in the future thanks to its infinity and environmentally friendly. To illustrate
this
, energy from nuclear resources contributes more than 50% of electric productivity in America, Germany and several developing countries.
Besides
, local residents
also
have good views about them because of their stability.
Nevertheless
, there are some drawbacks to using them
such
as catastrophic consequences when a factory has issues or lacks radiation management. Because an atomic bomb
is used
Wrong verb form
uses
show examples
the same fuel as nuclear power plants,
hence
it can destroy a large area. The Chornobyl disaster is a good example of its backward,
in contrast
to hydroelectric and solar panels which are well-known for their safety. When the machines of the water system
have
Wrong verb form
had
show examples
problems, they became overheated, and
as a result
, there was a large boom, and
this
area became a death state. All people who lived near the centre booming were dead because of cancer, and water sources became too polluted to use, after that the government needed to spend a large budget to fix
this
issue. In conclusion, nuclear has solved numerous energy problems. To decrease their risk, managers should cautiously operate them if they do not
want
Add the particle
want to
show examples
have an area where humans can not live.
Submitted by duongducanh06 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that all paragraphs have a clear topic sentence and support the main argument. Use more transition words to improve the flow of ideas between paragraphs.
task achievement
Provide more specific examples to support arguments, and ensure that all examples are relevant to the main topic. Address both sides of the argument to show a balanced view.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • non-renewable resources
  • sustainable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • radioactive waste
  • nuclear proliferation
  • energy efficiency
  • fossil fuels
  • renewable energy sources
  • decommissioning
  • intermediate solution
  • modular reactors
  • feasible
  • uninterrupted supply
  • combat climate change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: