Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

In today's fast-growing world, it is debated whether the government should invest more in public benefit cause rather than in developing

arts

like music and theatre. I do not completely agree with

this

statement. Art is an important cultural heritage of a

nation

that needs to be maintained with changing lifestyles and traditions timely.

This

demands huge monetary investments

for example

holding exhibitions both nationally and internationally, establishing

arts

institutes and

centers

Change the spelling

centres

show examples

, and building theatres .

thus

to keep one

nation

alive its culture needs to be developed. so investing in

arts

is investing in the livelihood of the

nation

. public interests indeed are an important part of a

nation

's survival but many NGOs are

also

actively working to help the needy. The government should

also

contribute its role by collaborating with these NGOs holding public welfare programs. In conclusion, I would like to enlighten the importance of art for a

nation

which is already been discussed before that it is as essential for people as their basic needs. the government should

also

take part in public interest plans but should not compromise in doing investments in

arts

for

such

programs.