In some places, fast food, prepared meals, and sugary drinks are now sold in more shops and at lower prices than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Food is one of the basic requirements of human beings. Taking a proper meal would lead people to gain more happiness in their lives. Most shops are selling various fast food items including sugary drinks nowadays for lesser prices. There can be considerable advantages and disadvantages to the consumption of these prepared grub in comparison to the past society.
At the initial phase of the discussion, we can engage ourselves with the positives of selling fast food at a lesser price. Selling quick diets can be profitable for sellers and might be easy to prepare. Things can make a humungous impact on civilization in many ways. Most of the community would tend to use fast cuisine to save the occasion they would spend on cooking. Purchasing meals at lower prices can be favourable for people with the consideration of the cost factor.
The easier way is not always the perfect way to satisfy needs and wants. Fast meals always contain numerous unhealthy ingredients. In earlier days, the ancient community cooked their meals every time at the home. They used healthy ingredients always to keep the family healthy. Health factor is the best concern at that time. The modern world has kept society in a busy lifestyle and prepared diets have the license to play a massive role in that.
The bottom line of the discussion is exciting. The comparison of the grub and lifestyles of people in the modern world with the past can be critically summarised. A healthier community is always valuable to a country. World has thought about their health first without giving priority to secondary things.
vishvaisuranga
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction
Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.
Some individuals believe that the right place to teach children how to become good citizens is the school, while others argue that parents should be the ones responsible for that. Although parents might influence their children more than anyone else, I believe that educational institutions are more trained and equipped to teach children how to become successful members of the community.
It is often considered by some menageries are inhuman and should be banned by governments while there are people who disagree with this and think zoos are helpful to protect endangered species. While some support their opinion with reasonable arguments like numerous animals suffer in cramped cages and are not looked after correctly , others consider the animal collection a safe place for breeding and important to increase public knowledge and affection for the environment and I rely on their arguments. This essay will discuss two side views.
Scientists view that sending messages into other universes is considered a good idea to find a place to live, while others opine this idea is dangerous. This essay will examine both perspectives and present my opinion.
Whether or not funding should be allocated to roads and motorised vehicle paths rather than spent on public transport is a debatable topic. This writer contends that investments in public transportation systems are much more necessary, for their cost-effectiveness and reduced cost of long-distance travel.