Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open,and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media.Do you agree with this view,or do you think that in some circumstances governments should limit the freedom of the media?

Nowadays,many populations grab the view that plenty of information and current affairs tend to be open completely without any mysteries,

in addition

, the controls for a family to read newspapers and watch the news should be prohibited and the authority should pass a new law about

this

topic.Here in the following paragraphs that will be mentioned below, my judgements of mine will be analyzed, and expended and

also

will provide a highly qualified explanation. To commence,in the majority of the representative countries all of the news must be provided on the radio completely.

However

, there are some individuals who may panic about disasters that can be the main contributor to the catastrophe.

For instance

,

according to

the disaster that occurred in Turkey,the citizens of Uzbekistan reached very quickly and argued that Uzbekistan will have the same earthquake,but they became inequitable to draw conclusions,so

as a result

the current transactions

such

as these,should be kept as a secret and should be unknown and unfamiliar to the society.

Moreover

, not keeping the affairs that may have a detrimental effect on the public

that is

remarked above,might become the main donor of the community's fear and discouragement.In order to deter

this

circumstance,some of the countries depleted considerably the news publishing supplies. All things considered,literary in some of the occurrences the administration should restrict the amount of publishing independence.I am able to suggest that television should only produce depressed and unbiased data that we,as individuals may know