Government need to pay for dyeing languages.Both vie and your opinion

There has been a growing trend among individuals around the globe to use national tongues, threatening local dialects as fewer communities tend to use their local tongues. Some

people

Use synonyms

propose it is the government's responsibility to fund

such

Linking Words

languages

Use synonyms

and preserve them,

while

Linking Words

others justifiably argue that it is a waste of

money

Use synonyms

and that governments should devote no funds to

this

Linking Words

purpose. I approve of the latter idea since there are various fields which need

money

Use synonyms

. On the one hand, some

people

Use synonyms

are of the view that regional dialects should be preserved as they are of great importance for cultural diversity and help local residents to develop a sense of identity. As

such

Linking Words

, they argue that governments should allocate budgets in order to prevent them from becoming extinct. A number of

people

Use synonyms

say, that were the governments to protect the various cultures that exist around their country, they should invest in their

language

Use synonyms

as

language

Use synonyms

is a prominent part of every culture. One possible solution, they argue, is for the authority to devote

money

Use synonyms

to schemes

such

Linking Words

as educating

people

Use synonyms

or developing curriculums to help them become familiar with their regional dialects and, in turn, preserve these less-spoken forms of

language

Use synonyms

.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, they claim that, having a specific form of speech, dwellers in a particular area are more likely to develop a sense of identity

as a result

Linking Words

of sharing a form of

language

Use synonyms

unique to them. Other

people

Use synonyms

,

on the other hand

Linking Words

, justifiably believe that government funds should not be allocated to

languages

Use synonyms

spoken by very few individuals and that these local forms of speech will be disappeared in a foreseeable future

however

Linking Words

hard we try to protect them. As

such

Linking Words

, both local

people

Use synonyms

and the public would derive enormous benefits if the fund is devoted to other segments, for ,example education and healthcare. Providing individuals in society with affordable or free education plays a pivotal role in the creation of a decent community where all

people

Use synonyms

can flourish. In less affluent countries,Iran

for instance

Linking Words

, where a sizeable number of

people

Use synonyms

are deprived of having access to proper free education, devoting a generous budget to

this

Linking Words

sector is likely to prove highly beneficial in the long run as opposed to wasting budgets by merely trying to protect some underused

languages

Use synonyms

.

Moreover

Linking Words

, with the ever-soaring costs of medical care, it can

also

Linking Words

be a wise decision to invest

money

Use synonyms

in

this

Linking Words

segment which has created several difficulties, particularly in less developed countries where

people

Use synonyms

are, at times, unable to afford the expenditures. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

there are benefits in preserving local forms of speech in order to save cultural diversity, I am completely inclined to the view that investing the

money

Use synonyms

in other segments yields more desired results both for minority cultures and

languages

Use synonyms

and the society as a whole.