The perspectives on the preservation of languages with few speakers vary widely. Some people argue that governments should invest capital in preventing those languages from dying out, while others regard it as wasting re
Nobody doubts that languages are the most important way to communicate in human history. Some languages still exist and have been wildly used for hundreds or thousands of years. But not all of them managed to survive til
There is a plethora of dying languages in the world that belong to ancient time. Recently, preserving these ancient languages has sparked controversy regarding whether it is a good idea or just wasting time and energy. H
In today's globalized world, language is a significant and symbolic item to connect to the world. Many languages worldwide, like English, Chinese, and Spanish, are the most spoken languages worldwide. However, several la
Nowadays, some people think that the government should spend to maintain minority languages while others have different opinions about this situation. This argument will discuss both sides and my perspective.
As the world we live in gets more globalized, the colorfulness of world languages diminishes due to radiation of one international language principle. While certain individuals believe that countries are responsible to p
People around the world have many different cultures such as a language , a food or else. Growing up in different ways and uses local language, which is minority languages, Some of governments feel that should invest in
Languages play an important role in everyone's life.It is a way to communicate,but these days native speech is becoming extinct.So it is often argued by a few masses that governance should use the money for conserving t
Languages play an important role in everyone's life.Moreover,it is a way to communicate,but these days native speech is becoming extinct.Therefore,it is often argued by a few masses that governance should use the money
An argument has arose between two opinions, the first one says that governments have to spend money to protect the rare languages, while the adverse view believes that this will be money-consuming. This report presents b
some people believe that the govermants need to spend some of the public money to save the minority languages, however other people think that is just wasting money to save the minority languages, and the govermants shou
In this contemporary epoch, a certain number of individuals believe that it is vital to save the languages in society through government investments while others do not agree. This essay will delve into both views, with
The line graph illustrates the levels of international trading of Australia to 4 countries Japan, the US, China and India over the period from 1990 to 2012.
Few people feel that the nation should invest some finance to preserve the few minority languages of the country, while other people believe that investing in the less popular languages is not a good option. This essay a
Government policy on spending money for preserving language is still debatable. There are number of people believe that government should allocate the budget for language which is used by few users in order to save the l
People have different views about whether municipal governments should spend financial budgets on protecting rare languages. While it is important for authorities to protect the endangering languages from dying out, I co
Some representatives of contemporary society believe that governments should invest in rare languages in order to preserve them for future generations, while others believe that such expenditures do not make sense. Fro
In a present day, some people believe that the government should more focus on folk languages and protect them from extinction by investing, while others argue that it wastes the taxes and less important than other campa
It is undisputed that although there are many languages in this world, there are a few major languages people mostly use, such as English, Chinese, French, etc. Therefore, some minority languages are ignored because inve