It is argued that some personal information could be asked by a potential employer at the time of hiring a new asset for the company. From my point of view some data,
such
as hobbies or interests, could lead to a better understanding of the future employee. Linking Words
However
, I strongly believe family status-related information should not be used for forming an opinion or hiring anybody.
What a person does with his free time could tell us a lot about himself, his life habits and what skills he would be able to put at service of the position. Linking Words
Furthermore
, it is extremely useful to have an understanding of all these abilities in order to guide Linking Words
this
new human resource inside Linking Words
of
the company. Change preposition
apply
For instance
, a sportive person interested in team sports could be a very supportive asset for working with other colleagues as he is used to it.
Linking Words
On the other hand
knowledge about marital status must not be handled by an employer for dealing with new hires. Linking Words
Nevertheless
, we see daily how employers tend to discriminate against possible employees funding their decision on Linking Words
this
status. Linking Words
This
occurs especially in the case of giving an opportunity to women. Some companies may see maternity leave as an inconvenience to their project so they prefer to select a higher group of men rather than going for equal opportunities.
In conclusion, Linking Words
while
data concerning hobbies and habits are extremely useful for knowing about the new hiring, family-related knowledge should not be an incentive for selecting a potential worker Linking Words
thus
I reckon Linking Words
this
could lead to unfair choices and go against one of the most important struggles society is confronting recently, equality.Linking Words
xema_rg