some people say that science and technology subjects are important while other say history subjects,what do you think?

There is a dispute surrounding the importance of

science

,

technology

and

history

: whilst some people believe

history

is essential, others state the opposite. In my view, subjects

such

as

technology

and

science

ought to be prioritized over

history

, because of their significance to the future and their complexity. First and foremost,

science

and

technology

tremendously promoted an enhancement in the quality of our life. Indeed, our surroundings are abounding by innovations, devised by scientists and engineers. No wonder why the 21 century has the nickname "The Age of

technology

".

For instance

, penicillin - the world's first medication have been created hundreds of years ago, and since

then

it was rescuing millions of people per year. On top of that, these modifications not merely guard us against illnesses, but

also

makes life easier. A good example is satellites, which all the online maps, meetings, and conversations happen through. On contrary, the knowledge of past times will not either be likely to protect humans from catchy diseases or assist to maintain bonds with distant relatives.

Furthermore

, being adept at

science

or

technology

requires a great deal of work. Undeniably, these subjects are renowned for their high level of difficulty. Engineering and

science

are precise "languages" which demand immense focus and dedication That's why the students who succeed in these domains are sought-after in almost every country and receive unimaginable salaries. For evidence, the normal salary of engineers is approximately 65 000 American dollars per year in the USA, as opposed to historians, which is 50 000.

Hence

, it should be centralized in the school education system. In a nutshell,

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

think,

history

should come after challenging subjects like

science

and

technology

.