Essay Question: Some people think that to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately-owned vehicles should be banned in city centres, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

In today's world, the problem of congestion in megapolises is increasing.

While

some believe privately-owned vehicles should be prohibited, others think

this

is unreal. Both sides will be analysed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn

Firstly

, some claim that encouraging more society to use public shipment would have a positive impact on the environment.

For instance

, the air would not be polluted

due to

exhaust fumes which are produced by cars. If the government provided cheaper passages, citizens would use public transit more often than now.

This

shows why prohibiting privately-owned transport has garnered support. Meanwhile, there is

an

Remove the article

apply

show examples

another group who believes that it is impossible to check and control what kinds of vehicles enter and leave the

city

centre. Like namely,

this

area of the

city

is overcrowded, a lot of movement

are

Correct subject-verb agreement

is

show examples

driven and plenty of public deal with their problems in

this

area,

due to

the huge number of business centres, schools, shops and so on. If the government brought in a law to rule what types are transport

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

used in the

city

centre, it would take extra expenses for new control systems and new employees.

This

shows why some people are against prohibiting public shipment. In summary,

it is clear that

both sides have strong grounds

in

Change preposition

for

show examples

their views.

However

, in my opinion, banning privately-owned transport in the

city

centre should not be done because it would be very tough to control people and their vehicles.

That is

why viable alternative solutions should be found.