In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

It is true that
video
surveillance has become commonplace in many cities in recent years.
While
I understand that critics may see
this
as an invasion of privacy, I believe that the merits do outweigh the demerits. There are two main reasons why people might disapprove of the use of
cameras
in public places. The first objection is that
cameras
invade our privacy, in that sense we are constantly being watched by the authorities or by private security firms.
In addition
, many people find that intrusion and feel that the recording of their movements is a form of state control that curtails their individual freedom. The second argument against the proliferation of CCTV
cameras
is that they are being used as an alternative to police officers patrolling the streets. If
this
is indeed happening
then
it is unlikely that members of the public will feel safe. In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I believe that the utility of
video
cameras
to monitor public areas is a positive measure. The key objective of
video
surveillance is to deter criminals and to intervene in crime. As a salient example, petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets are less likely to operate in parts of cities where they know that they are being monitored. At the same time, when crimes are committed, the police can use
video
evidence to catch and prosecute offenders.
Hence
, in my view,
video
cameras
offer valuable support to police officers, and they make cities safer for inhabitants, workers and visitors alike. As a way of conclusion, as far as I am concerned, we gain more than we lose from the enhanced security that CCTV
cameras
bring to our lives.
Submitted by omondavlat91 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: