On one hand, nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. On the other hand, nuclear weapons are a potent threat to world peace. Do the benefits of nuclear technology outweigh the risks? Give your opinion and support it with reasons.

It is been argued that nuclear technology is a blessing to the world in providing the much-required
energy
with little impact on the earth's environment.
However
, others suggest that it is dangerous for mankind as
countries
use
this
technology to create lethal weapons which can destroy life on Earth. In my opinion, If the method is used for the betterment, it can save our atmosphere from pollution.
This
essay will discuss both views and derive a logical conclusion. Technology is improving every day
due to
this
there is a greater demand for
energy
. Since
fossils fuel
Fix the agreement mistake
fossil fuels
show examples
are limited, there is a need for alternative sources to produce
energy
and one of them is nuclear
energy
. When
this
method is used in a controlled way, it produces a cleaner and cheaper source of power.
Further
, there is an abundant supply of radioactive materials which are consumed in
this
method. Developed
countries
such
as the United States are generating approximately 70% of the demand using controlled nuclear fusion and
thus
, one of the heavy consumers of power with uninterrupted supply.
On the other hand
, many
countries
are using nuclear processes to create weapons to create their supremacy. After
world war
Correct your spelling
World War
show examples
II, many nations started building new arsenals using these methods. Most
countries
these days are holding nuclear warheads, which are not only dangerous for the nations at war but
also
their entire life on earth.
For instance
, Russia and the USA are competing to maximize nuclear warheads. In conclusion,
although
people are using radioactive methods
for creating
Change preposition
to create
show examples
threatening arms, in my opinion, there is an immediate need for a continuous supply of clean
energy
to save the planet from carbon emissions generated by fossil fuels.
Therefore
, nations should focus on using these methods constructively rather than building dangerous weapons.
Submitted by yoursvicky129 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body, and conclusion. The ideas are logically connected and well-organized. However, there is room for improving on the connection of your main points to your supporting evidence. Be sure each example specifically backs up the point you're making, rather than asserting generally accepted notions.
task achievement
You've done well in delivering a complete response, providing clear and comprehensive ideas backed up by relevant examples. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement with regards to bringing in more specific examples. While the USA-Russia reference is relevant, consider more diverse examples that could augment your argument.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: