There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It's controversial whether some

subjects

that are considered non-academic,

such

as sports and cooking classes, could be unnecessary, some people state,

while

others believe, the importance of these

subjects

. I partially agree with

this

statement.

This

essay examines the reasons why I believe so,

firstly

, undoubtedly, today's education system is highly saturated with various

subjects

, which is very challenging for the

student

, they struggle with many academic and important courses

such

as business management and mathematics, and these require a lot of effort

as well as

time to master,

consequently

, the non-academic

subjects

are a waste of time that could be invested in the main course,

furthermore

, the

overall

score could be impacted

due to

these non-academic courses because the majority of the students focus on the

subjects

with the highest percentage of the

overall

band.

On the other hand

, these

subjects

, like physical education might be optional for many students,

nevertheless

. it is significantly impactful in terms of

student

's mindset and activeness,

in other words

, a healthy body surely helps to clear the mind, which can boost remarkably the

student

's yield, speaking of cookery, it is essential to learn

this

skill because, as

student

cooking a homemade meal is cheaper

as well as

healthier, these

subjects

might be optional in academic life but they are highly demanded in the daily life.

To conclude

, I believe that non-academic

subjects

might seem like a barrier to excelling at the university,

However

, they could play a major role in the lifestyle of the individual,