Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, air polution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed by some people that one practical way to produce lower levels of air and noise

pollution

is to restrict flight numbers. In order to achieve

this

goal, it is considered to set higher taxes on the

flights

. Despite

this

, I personally disagree that the government should limit the number of

flights

, especially to holiday destinations. First and foremost, every individual has the right to travel to any location, and by increasing the cost of travelling, a higher proportion of the population can not afford it.

Therefore

, rich individuals would enjoy a vocation, and an opposing sector would not be able to unwind and be refreshed.

On the other hand

, authorities should not limit the number of

flights

to industrial and economic regions.

This

is because all the people need to go to these areas for other purposes

besides

a holiday.

Thus

, if the government is forced to restrict

flights

or even make them more expensive, that should not be allocated to travelling to metropolitan cities.

For instance

, a lot of businessmen have to meet an important person in Tehran city, and

by

Change preposition

apply

show examples

means of assigning a heavy tax, it would not be achievable.

Moreover

, the construction of

airports

does not seem a problem. There are many empty places which could be designated for

airports

, and

this

does not harm a person's life. It can be seen that a lot of large cities have more than one

airports

which might be because of controlling the

flights

more precisely.

For example

, Moscow has two separate

airports

in distinct areas for different airlines.

However

,

pollution

is increasingly making trouble. The complications are not limited to noise

pollution

but

also

they are leading to many health problems.

For instance

, a single journey by an aeroplane burns hundreds of litres of fuel

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and produces hazardous particles, which may result in numerous cancers, particularly lung cancer. As convincing as

this

point is, the pluses are more significant than the disadvantages, and in a modernized society, reducing journeys is not attainable. In conclusion, excursions are necessary for both relaxing and financial purposes.

Therefore

,it is something inevitable, but developed countries should find solutions in order to diminish its setbacks like air

pollution

.