Some people think that governments should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is a common belief that governments have a responsibility for investing more
money
in teaching
science
than other
subjects
for a
country
's
progress
.
However
, there is a more persuasive argument that investing more
money
in teaching
science
is not desirable for a
country
.
This
is because biased investing could damage the rights of students' selection, and cause inefficiency.
To begin
with, investing more
money
in teaching
science
could derive the chance of experiencing many
subjects
equally. The students should receive a well-rounded
education
in school. Investment in teaching
science
could cause less investment in other
subjects
. A recent study shows that the people who got a well-rounded
education
tend to decide their major or jobs easily, because of having enough chances to study various
subjects
equally in their school hood. On top of that, it is inefficient for governments to invest more
money
in teaching
science
for a
country
's development. The time that investment in
science
is needed for a
country
's
progress
is when the small company makes new products by studying
science
for a long time. Studying
science
at a high level of
education
,
such
as undergraduate, or inventing a new product really leads to a
country
's
progress
or development.
For instance
, in Korea, the government invests more
money
in studying and producing Covid-19 diagnosing kits, and it helps many scientists contribute to the
country
's
progress
.
To sum up
, I disagree with the idea that the government should invest more
money
in teaching
science
than other
subjects
for two reasons.
This
is because the students have the right to receive a well-rounded
education
and investing in commercializing scientific ideas is a more efficient way to a
country
's
progress
than investing in teaching
science
Submitted by bebuls on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: