Technological advancement has provided a conducive environment for
people
to conduct
home
-based work, and some
people
reckon that
this
mode of working is only advantageous for
employees
but not supervisors.
Therefore
, I disagree with the idea that workers may benefit more from
such
an arrangement
whereas
employers may be disadvantaged.
Firstly
, working from
home
saves companies a fortune in office building construction and technical assistance
such
as laptops and other work-related equipment. Working from
home
facilitates employers to save on the day-to-day operation cost.
For instance
, Every business is based on a physical infrastructure that requires a daily operating budget, ranging from electricity bills, water bills and
staff
services. Money saved can be allocated to other development of the association
such
as investment in technical support, advanced workforce service and introducing new technology
that is
beneficial for the company's future development.
Secondly
, working from
home
allows the crew to save
time
from daily transportation to the workplace. By saving
time
for commuting,
staff
may allocate more
time
to perform more tasks
instead
of spending most of the
time
on transport.
For instance
, some
staff
may live in remote areas where a large amount of
time
is required for commuting,
however
,
this
time
can be used to accomplish more tasks and increase productivity. The goal of an organisation
that is
set for at least one month to complete may
then
be achieved in only two weeks or less if
people
have more hours on the job.
Thus
, companies may benefit more from prolonged working hours for
employees
.
In contrast
, by working from
home
,
employees
may not have the opportunity to effectively exchange innovative ideas and have meaningful discussions with each other in a virtual world.
This
may adversely impact the productivity and profitability of the association. The lack of interaction among workers may result in a situation where
people
may find it difficult to establish a tacit understanding with each other and lead to misunderstanding in the context of certain projects.
For example
, if group members are short of communication, it would pose a strain on the progress of a particular project as
people
may find it challenging to follow up and contribute to delivering desired outcomes.
As a result
, the development of an organisation may be slowed down
due to
unproductivity among members and ineffective management among departments.
In a nutshell, I disagree with the notion that
employees
benefit more, as companies have the potential to make comparative profit with prolonged working hours for
staff
and cut down on daily operation budget, even though the deprivation of communication among company members may have a negative effect on the progress of the whole company.