It is argued that authorities spend their income on track rather than
harbour
. Add an article
a harbour
the harbour
however
, I disagree with the statement that government must spend their money on railways.
on one hand, those Linking Words
people
who support that it is better to pay more money to track rather than streets. claim that it is more viable because public travel around the world by trains and not by cars or buses. Use synonyms
For example
, a study which was published in 2010 by Global Universities found that the percentage of nationsLinking Words
travel
by train increased sharply Wrong verb form
travelling
last
decade. In my opinion, I don't think that Linking Words
this
gives more advantages to railways rather than streets.
Linking Words
on the other hand
, I believe that Linking Words
people
need more Use synonyms
roads
for their entertainment. Use synonyms
This
is because when Linking Words
people
want to have fun on off days they often go to good places with good construction Use synonyms
roads
.Use synonyms
In addition
, if there were no great Linking Words
roads
, Use synonyms
community
would not visit some countries. Another reason given to support Add an article
the community
this
idea is that Linking Words
roads
give cultural abstract that may interest a huge amount of human Use synonyms
being
. Fix the agreement mistake
beings
For instance
, the government in Saudi Arabia has spent 20% of their income to interact with Linking Words
people
to visit local and historical places in Riyadh and Abha Use synonyms
as well as
the United States.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
railways may be a good investment for the public Linking Words
due to
the increase in travel Linking Words
last
few years , I believe that investing in streets are more vital for anyone because it reflects Linking Words
cultural
Add an article
the cultural
a cultural
view
of Fix the agreement mistake
views
tourist
and citizens.Fix the agreement mistake
tourists
thamer13456