Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. What is your opinion?

Currently, high crime rates have concerned many countries.

While

some people say that reinforcing

police

activity on streets would be the only option to prevent

crimes

, others argue that several measures could

also

help with

this

. I strongly agree with the latter statement and

this

essay will support my view with examples. First and foremost, increasing the quantity of

police

on the streets is only one out of many other measures that can improve the safety of urban areas.

For example

, for some private companies and residential neighbourhoods it is extremely common to hire security guards to prevent

crimes

such

as invasions and thefts.

As a result

, criminal activity in these places, where there are professionals working to guarantee their protection, is unlikely to happen.

Therefore

,

police

activity can be replaced by private security, and the result will be exactly the same.

Additionally

, humans are not always required to reduce

crimes

; other objects can

also

play an important role in

this

.

Cameras

,

for example

; if they are installed in dangerous areas of cities to record everything that happens there, criminals will probably avoid these places.

In other words

, when there are

cameras

around, crime rates tend to drop, as criminals will not take the risk of getting caught by the recordings.

Consequently

,

cameras

, which have been heavily used worldwide to prevent

crimes

, illustrate that people should not count only on the

police

to protect them.

To conclude

, countries that have been struggling with

crimes

should encourage their population to invest in both private security and infrastructure for

cameras

, which are highly effective against criminals. Having more

police

on the streets should

also

be considered,

however

, it is not the only way to reduce crime.