Music should not be taught in schools. Instead other subjects such as computer and science should be taught. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?

As a consequence

multitudinous technologies which have been invented create a paradigm that mainstream subjects like science and the computer should replace

music

by giving more portion for both lessons in the school.

However

, I disagree with the previous notion.

Then

, there will be rational explanations in the following paragraphs.

To begin

with, a plethora of psychology studies argue that people have different passions.

This

contention means

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

numerous students who are keen on

art

studies like

music

cannot ameliorate their qualifications in the education institution.

As a consequence

, they will be forced to love materials which are not appropriate to their hobbies like computers and science.

For example

, several popular artists from the past time like Mozart and Beethoven were not good at natural subjects.

However

, they were inspired to ameliorate their

art

ability when the

art

classes were taught to them.

Furthermore

, allowing the existence of

music

lessons in the curriculum has another benefit for learners.

For instance

, some psychologists with a number of their research outputs explain that playing instruments like piano and violin is able to reduce stress.

In other words

, when the

music

class starts, the majority of students can be happy in view of dopamine and endorphin as hormones which create happiness in their bodies increase massively.

Consequently

,

this

class can be a perfect time to relax which can assist their productivity after it.

To conclude

, I redeclare my consideration that

music

materials are still required in the education systems. That notion comes

due to

the existence of

art

lessons having some advantages

such

as improving students' ability and declining stress.