Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

These days, choosing a major to study at university has become

one

of the most controversial debates. The two diverse notions have been stated which

one

is studying your favourable subject,

while

the other

one

suggests taking beneficial courses,

thus

,

science

and technology. I believe that students should be allowed to choose their desirable subject despite its benefits. On

one

hand, some people argue that selecting majors which are not profitable can be a way of wasting your time and life.

In other words

, they believe pupils are not permitted to spend their precious lifetime working on other subjects. Art and music,

for example

, are considered as some kind of career which are less in relation to technology and

science

and should not be taught freely in institutes.

On the other hand

, an adverse group of people claim that university majors should be chosen by pupils based on their interests and talents.

Moreover

, it ought not to be compulsory and forced by their parents or society. Their preference,

for instance

, might be off

science

related;

however

, should not be underestimated or neglected because it may illustrate its usefulness in the near future.

Furthermore

, it is chiefly unreasonable to assume that every student can be successful in studying majors associated with technology. In conclusion, despite

two

Correct article usage

the two

show examples

viewpoints which have been discussed, I firmly hold

this

Correct determiner usage

the

show examples

opinion that scholars should occupy their time at university with their preferable subjects whether they are connected to

science

or there is no correlation between them.