In many countries, there is some divided decision in the case of smoking
tobacco
in public places
such
as offices and restaurants. Some nations have given
this
permission to
smokers
to do their habit in these specific places but other nations were not willing to do so. In
this
essay, both sides of the discussion will be considered.
On the one hand, those who support smoking
tobacco
in these buildings promote the idea that the rights and
freedom
of every human being should be saved. When
people
want to smoke
this
kind of drug, it should be their decision to where do
this
action
due to
their rights and
freedom
of action. In
this
not all of the states worldwide have given
this
amount of
freedom
to their nations.
For example
, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan could be named as countries with restrictions on smoking in public places.
Furthermore
, proponents of consuming
tobacco
in public highlight the difficulty of their needs. When the state supports
people
enough to not let them go through any hard times, especially when it’s about the need of what your body demands because of the habit,
then
the consumers could use
tobacco
every other place they want to.
On the other hand
, opponents of
tobacco
are able to cite the evidence of
tobacco
consumption causes over 20 different types of cancer for the smoker themselves, but
this
danger is not dedicated to only
smokers
; but, it has a major effect on humans who are next to these users.
Therefore
, a country giving approval to
smokers
to emit
tobacco
in public
such
as offices and restaurants, which contain a huge amount of
people
could be an irretrievable mistake. Nowadays, the rising number of
people
who are suffering from these diseases could easily be seen.
Moreover
, critics of smoking
tobacco
claim that the city has no longer the aesthetics of the town as before. As long as
smokers
and none
smokers
share rooms in public would cause
this
inevitable damage to the sight of the town, which no longer the city has its beautifulness and cause
this
divided picture of
people
.
In conclusion, I would tend to side with the opponents of smoking
tobacco
in public. It seems to be unreasonable to give rights and
freedom
to
people
who could only cause different types of diseases to them.