It is often said that accepting hardships in life
such
as working for a job that you are not interested in, or facing financial struggles is a good idea. In my opinion, Linking Words
however
, I believe that individuals should make a lot of effort to change their lives in a better way.
On the one hand, self-satisfaction provides a high level of security. To be more specific, when a person stays in their comfort zone, they are not obliged to deal with problems and Linking Words
as a
Linking Words
result
they can stay away from risks. To illustrate, an employee working for the same company for many years can save their income Add a comma
,result
instead
of making a career switch that involves a big pay cut. Even though the pay rate is not high, and the job doesn’t seem to be appealing, they still opt to stay to have a sense of stability.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, I would argue that we should endeavour to change the status quo because Linking Words
this
action can change our lives. A good example of it is the founder of KFC Colonel Sanders. After years of failures including being fired from multiple jobs and misfortunes, Sanders Linking Words
finally
hit it big at the age of 62. KFC expanded internationally and he sold the company for two million dollars, making him one of the wealthiest men during that period.
In conclusion, trying not to alter the state of affairs can result in peace of mind. Linking Words
However
, Linking Words
this
way of living does not guarantee a happy life in the long run.Linking Words
phamduchien711