school should teach subjects that are needed for academic success and to pass exams. Practical life skills such as cookery, dressmaking and crafting should be taught at home, by family and friends. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some people think that school should be a place where students study academic subjects to pass exams, rather than learning

skills

like dressing and cooking. In my opinion, despite the importance of academic research, a scholar must

also

learn fundamental life techniques. On the one hand, the study of academic theory is vital for students in many ways.

First,

the results of examinations are necessary for the academic performance of a scholar. With good results, they will easily enter the faculty of higher education.

Secondly

, the academic course better equips the fundamental education to be used in the higher college.

For instance

, most scholars in India are expected to take subjects

such

as microeconomics and advanced mathematics, which consist of mathematical

skills

taught at the university.

Consequently

, without a deep understanding, they may fail their final exams and have to repeat

this

course again, which is time-consuming and costly.

However

, there are several reasons why a scholar still needs to master a practical technique.

For example

, if you live away from your family, life experiences

such

as cooking can be helpful for making healthy and affordable meals on your own

instead

of eating out at restaurants.

In addition

, attending

skills

development classes at the institute is

also

an effective way for them to unwind after many hours of academic study.

Thus

, through a wide range of

activities

Add a comma

,activities

show examples

the graduates are not only able to relax but

also

perform better in the examination.

To sum up

, In conclusion, I disagree that students should only consider academic learning because both academic learning and practical

skills

are equally important and should be taught in school.