Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
In the modern era, one of the most controversial issues today relates to salaries. Some
people
believe that large organizations should receive more money
than ordinary employees, while
others argue that it is unfair. I personally believe that receiving more money
from large organizations is unfair. In this
essay, I will examine from both points of view and explain my opinion.
On one side of the argument, some people
believe that to enter large companies
, they should prepare a significant number of qualifications, spending a lot of money
. For example
, large companies
request a high educational background, experience such
as volunteering and activities of companies
and interviews to enter companies
. Individuals have to prepare requests to achieve the goal through much money
, as well as
survive such
competition. For
this
reason, they think receiving a lot of money
is necessary.
On the other hand
, some people
believe that achievement is more important than the size of a corporation. To be more specific, if people
who enter large organizations receive much money
although
they do not have value achievement, they will not struggle to work even if they do not climb the corporate ladder. Thus
, companies
will have low profits since they are not likely to be not only productive but also
effective at their workplace. Moreover
, ordinary workers’ achievements will be underestimated because of social eyes.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that receiving much higher money
from large companies
is unfair since salaries should be reassessed through efforts. Thus
, salaries should be encouraged by their achievement and efforts.Submitted by kk884 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Introduction and conclusion are clearly structured, but they could be more compelling. To improve this, use more engaging language and clear statements that hook the reader and provide a stronger summarization of your stance in the conclusion.
coherence cohesion
The essay generally follows a logical structure. However, transitions between ideas can be smoother. Use more linking phrases such as 'furthermore', 'in addition', 'however', to better connect paragraphs and sentences.
coherence cohesion
Your main points are supported, but there's room for providing more specific examples and evidence. Expand on your examples by explaining why they are relevant and how they support your argument. Consider incorporating statistics, studies, or real-world instances to strengthen your position.
task achievement
You've made an effort to address the task, and your response reflects an understanding of it. To further improve, make sure to discuss both viewpoints thoroughly before leading to your conclusion. Presenting a more balanced view can enrich your argument.
task achievement
Your ideas are clear and comprehensively presented, but they could benefit from more depth. Delve into the implications or consequences of your points to provide a more thorough analysis of the issue.
task achievement
While you've given examples, incorporating more detailed and specifically relevant examples related to the prompt will make your argument stronger. Look for case studies or anecdotes that directly tie back to your key points.