Some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention, while others believe that it is the responsibility of the individual to protect themselves. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Whilst there is a number of people who believe that the administration must underscore the prohibition of

crime

, others advocate that everyone must rescue themselves individually. There are rational arguments on both sides of

this

contentious topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own take on the matter in conclusion. On the one hand, there are those compelling reasons that government is answerable for

crime

prevention and

therefore

it is the sole factor in

society

to protect individuals.

That is

to say, the regime has the un-repression authority to impose taxes and financial penalties

as well as

other considerable financial resources that it has from all aspects of the nation so by allocating ample budget regime is able to prevent a significant amount of crimes in the community to maintain public

order

,

although

the government has the possession and authority on all powers and infrastructures of country, thereby, it can facilitate the headway toward depleting

crime

.

For instance

, having access to security cameras, identification and fingerprint information bank, skilled investigators and incentives, professional equipment and media gives the ability to administration to identify offenders before or after being accused and prevent the prospect of deleterious for people and

society

.

On the other hand

, the opposing view asserts that individuals must be responsible to rescue themselves from culprits.

As a consequence

, individuals must be trained in personal defence and have defensive equipment like guns and knives.

Therefore

, maintaining public

order

will be crucial if every dweller carries weapons, consumers' risk of execution and murder will rise in parallel.

Moreover

,

society

might experience severe violence and coercion in

this

state.

Additionally

, citizens are keen to earn money in inappropriate and criminal ways despite no law enforcement and imprisonment. And

society

is no more a safe place for elderlies and children

due to

their weaknesses.

To conclude

, there are valid arguments on both sides of

this

controversy, on balance.

However

, it is my firm conviction that attention should be paid to the improvement of the ability and authority of the government responsibility to prevent

crime

, in

order

to maintain public

order

and decrease detrimental violence in

society

.