Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people might say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Over recent years proclivity for

air

travel has substantially increased

due to

the advent of budget airline

services

.

Although

these inexpensive fights have granted low-cost travel experiences for desired vacations worldwide, it has led to first-hand issues like noise,

air

pollution and indirect consequences to nature.

Consequently

, there is an ongoing debate that to curb these harmful effects, it should be imposed high taxes on the aviation industry. In my opinion,

this

solution is precarious in the least, and I will elaborate on my views against it. It is a very well-known fact that the airline industry is booming, and there are a

number

of employees who depend on

this

either directly or indirectly.

For example

, even some countries have several airline

services

and connected commercial activities, and the implementation of stringent will adversely affect these

services

, as a matter of fact, they have to cost-cutting their operational costs so which will cause a

number

of forfeiting jobs

for

Change preposition

apply

show examples

the employees.

Therefore

,

this

type of suggestion will be detrimental to development of the commercial activities and the livelihood of numerous people.

Furthermore

, the adversities experienced will not be only limited to

air

-

services

companies but

also

which will negatively affect the whole economy because these

services

directly contribute to the country’s economy by expanding tourism and import-export goods trade.

For instance

, introducing a strict high-tax policy, which will cut down the

number

of international

air

flyers.

As a consequence

, it will cripple the global economy.

Nevertheless

, issues like environmental pollution and its side effects cannot be ignored. Though, simply putting higher taxation, which might reduce the

number

of

air

flyers, in reality, has unfavourable after-effects.

To sum up

, I would like to say that the negative outcomes of

air

traffic are evident and have to be acknowledged.

However

, restraining the growth of the industry is not a feasible answer for

this

matter and alternatives have to be found to trickle the situation.