Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Housing shortages in big cities are a common

issue

we are facing nowadays. Many folks believe that only the

government

is able to solve

this

problem.

However

, from the way I am thinking, I do not agree with

this

idea. On the one hand, it is undeniable that one of many

government

responsibilities is to ensure that the residents have houses to live in. I am convinced that all the councils in the world, regardless of the region where the cities are based. I remember a friend of mine once said that in his home country, the executive prepared and constructed buildings to accommodate the citizens. I was blown away when I heard

this

and

imagined

Verb problem

wondered

show examples

if the

government

in my homeland do the same thing.

However

, I realize that there are other, arguably more emerging, issues that are faced by the

government

, that need to be solved first. So waiting for the

government

to singlehandedly solve the housing

issue

is not a wise move we can

do

Verb problem

make

show examples

as a resident, especially if we are not from the richest country on

this

planet. On top of the

government

, I strongly believe that other players

also

play the same key role in

this

issue

, the private sector

for instance

. They can contribute to tackling the

issue

in their own ways.

Whereas

banks can help

its customer

Fix the agreement mistake

their customers

show examples

get a friendly loan to buy a house, property companies could provide an easy scheme to pay for the houses. Those are only two of many examples of how private sectors are able to help. What I want to say is that only

government

can solve

this

issue

.

To sum up

, I do not agree with people who think that only the executive can break down the problem as I strongly believe either

government

or non-

government

can help on their own, as aforementioned explanations.