Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

These days, it seems the emphasis on the

quantity

of goods has surpassed their quality. There remains some disagreement as to whether it is a positive or negative development.

While

there are valid arguments to the contrary, in

this

essay I would contend that there are more crucial issues like

education

as well as

the environment to be prioritized. The reasons for

this

are as follows. First of all, evident is the fact that neglecting

education

, which nurtures specialized workforces would pose some challenges in the process of manufacturing. A salient example of

this

is Japan, as its concentration on

education

, has enabled it to rank first in producing the most prominent products for global markets.

Thus

, rather than paying attention to

quantity

, emphasizing

education

could lead to manufacturing superior goods in the long term.

Secondly

and even more importantly should be preserving the environment and saving it for the upcoming generations. it is obvious that having produced a high

quantity

of goods, which entails harnessing natural resources, the depletion of natural resources is likely to occur. Taking Africa as an example, deforestation for industrial purposes, extracting from mines and overfishing have disrupted the natural ecosystem significantly. So, prior to producing any

further

material, valuing bringing up educated individuals and assessing geographical capabilities should be compulsory. By way of conclusion, valuing

education

as well as

the environment as valuable assets is crucial for achieving higher production.

Whereas

, putting excessive emphasis on

such

superficial issues like numbers or

quantity

would undermine the authenticity of the producer country and

disrupte

Correct your spelling

disrupt

disrupted

the ecological order.