Art classes, such as painting and drawing, are as important for children's development as other subjects, so it should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree?
It has been a controversial and debatable topic in recent days whether artistry has as paramount importance as any other stem subject ,especially for kids from 6 to 12 years. The education is considering making
art
classes compulsory in teenage life, by including art
sessions in the curriculum. In my humble opinion, I think art
sessions are not essential in teenage development, but they are for kids. In this
essay, I will illustrate my perspective in some kind of detail.
First and foremost, it is not a place of question whether craft is important for kids' development. Because it helps them to express their selves in different ways. For instance
, recent studies have approved that 90% of the children who practice any act of art
like painting and drawing have fewer anger issues and better mental health. Therefore
, schools need to play their rules by encouraging their students to involve with such
classes.
On the other hand
, Art
is a gift that can be enhanced and sharpened. In other words
, Art
can not be forced to learn if the person was not interested. This
can not apply to other subjects like science , math or history. Therefore
, in high school or tertiary
it is not fair to make Add a comma
,tertiary
art
subjects compulsory.
To sum up
, Art
is essential and important in early childhood but not after. I do not support making art
classes compulsory in high school. I suggest that art
subject should be an elective course for people who has this
amazing gift.Submitted by g0oo0 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.