Some people think the government should support artists like painters, musicians, and poets, while others believe this wastes money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Supporting
people
who are interested in artificial things by the government is a considerable opinion for some people
. On the contrary
, others are against this
purpose because they think it wastes money. It is supported because supporters think art
is required for improvement
. I believe that art
is important as as other things which are encouraged by the government.
To begin
with, the most essential reason for the against is they do not define art
as an activator of progress. To clarify, spending on art
should be spent on subjects which directly affect improvement
due to
their thoughts . To sum extent, it is a considerable offer because they prefer education or social helps instead
of unnecessary ones such
as painting or poetry. However
, according to
the
my belief it should not be seen as a waste of money. Remove the article
apply
This
is partly due to
the correlation between artificial improvement
levels and countries' development levels. For
example
countries which have a high amount of reputation in sciences and welfare generally have a see of Add a comma
,example
people
who are extremely high-quality artists.
On the other hand
, some people
want artists to be encouraged by the state because of their key roles in society and essential disciplines. Obviously
they have been thinking arts have been connected with Add a comma
,Obviously
science
. According to
their perspective
Add a comma
,perspective
art
can be used for science
like Da Vince did. From my aspect
it is a sound idea because there are a lot of examples of using Add a comma
,aspect
art
in science
,especially in the Renaissance. In light of examples that happened in Renaissance
other developments can not be thought Correct article usage
the Renaissance
without
the effects of Change preposition
of without
art
.
In conclusion, despite the fact that some individuals think the government should help artists others disagree with that aim. Spending taxes in order to art
means wasted money. Thus
they do not accept it might have benefits. In my estimation
they are wrong because Add a comma
,estimation
science
is not only key for improvement
but also
arts play crucial roles.Submitted by yunussemreozkaya on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.