Some people think the government should support artists like painters, musicians, and poets, while others believe this wastes money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Supporting
people
who are interested in artificial things by the government is a considerable opinion for some
people
.
On the contrary
, others are against
this
purpose because they think it wastes money. It is supported because supporters think
art
is required for
improvement
. I believe that
art
is important as as other things which are encouraged by the government.
To begin
with, the most essential reason for the against is they do not define
art
as an activator of progress. To clarify, spending on
art
should be spent on subjects which directly affect
improvement
due to
their thoughts . To sum extent, it is a considerable offer because they prefer education or social helps
instead
of unnecessary ones
such
as painting or poetry.
However
,
according to
the
Remove the article
apply
show examples
my belief it should not be seen as a waste of money.
This
is partly
due to
the correlation between artificial
improvement
levels and countries' development levels.
For
example
Add a comma
,example
show examples
countries which have a high amount of reputation in sciences and welfare generally have a see of
people
who are extremely high-quality artists.
On the other hand
, some
people
want artists to be encouraged by the state because of their key roles in society and essential disciplines.
Obviously
Add a comma
,Obviously
show examples
they have been thinking arts have been connected with
science
.
According to
their
perspective
Add a comma
,perspective
show examples
art
can be used for
science
like Da Vince did. From my
aspect
Add a comma
,aspect
show examples
it is a sound idea because there are a lot of examples of using
art
in
science
,especially in the Renaissance. In light of examples that happened in
Renaissance
Correct article usage
the Renaissance
show examples
other developments can not be thought
without
Change preposition
of without
show examples
the effects of
art
. In conclusion, despite the fact that some individuals think the government should help artists others disagree with that aim. Spending taxes in order to
art
means wasted money.
Thus
they do not accept it might have benefits. In my
estimation
Add a comma
,estimation
show examples
they are wrong because
science
is not only key for
improvement
but
also
arts play crucial roles.
Submitted by yunussemreozkaya on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: