Using new science to re-examine old
cases
is
controversialAdd an article
show examples
issue among
massesCorrect article usage
show examples
. Some people claim that authorities had better apply science related to criminal forensics in order to investigate past
cases
. I think that
this
is beneficial owing to some reasons,
however
, its
unfavorableChange the spelling
show examples
results cannot be neglected which will be interpreted in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, why criminal forensics should be used for previous
cases
?
SecondCorrect article usage
show examples
chance for justice is one of the causes.
In other words
, people, who were punished, even not
realCorrect article usage
show examples
culpritFix the agreement mistake
show examples
,
they Correct pronoun usage
show examples
can have
chanceAdd an article
show examples
for fairness.
Moreover
, if they are released from prisons, families can meet them after long
distanceFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. To point out as a perfect example, a survey conducted by National Sample Survey Office in 2018 revealed that with the help of DNA
more than 50%
oldChange preposition
show examples
cases
were solved.
Additionally
, Thanks to new science, new information and proofs can be uncovered which may bring fresh perspective evidence to
cases
that are closed for
longChange the article
show examples
time. It, undoubtedly, insights offence and its motive.
Hence
, government should
re-defineCorrect your spelling
show examples
old
cases
.
Paradoxically, revictimization is
primaryAdd an article
show examples
drawback of re-analysing old
cases
. Reopening to previous
cases
and exposing them to new information, seriously, can cause emotional distress to humans who are not prepared to deal with it again since they moved up from
this
which can be difficult for them to face
sameChange the article
show examples
situation once more.
Further
highlighting the point,
this
action, virtually, can open possibilities of wrongful ideas to families which leads to false
conclusionFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
As a result
, it cannot only hurt the victims but
also
provide untruthful information and evidence as well.
In conclusion, after analysing
the Remove the article
show examples
both
sideFix the agreement mistake
show examples
it can be stated that as every coin has both
sideChange to a plural noun
show examples
, trying criminal forensics to look at closed
cases
has positive and negative consequences, simultaneously.
Although
it can help innocent people, false
conclusionFix the agreement mistake
show examples
can be drawn
also
. It can provide
betterAdd an article
show examples
resultFix the agreement mistake
show examples
when new scrutinize would be fair.