Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high School programs (for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports youngsters).To what extent do you agree or disagree

Some

kids

spend their

time

only with their immediate household

while

growing up.

However

, others get

time

to spend with their friends, cousins and relatives. I think the second type would be a healthier option since they can improve their social skills from a very young age itself by spending

time

with more

people

.

Firstly

, the

kids

who grow up with their immediate family will find that they have more

time

than others.

Due to

this

reason, they might spend

time

by themselves more, and

hence

, they can get addicted to mobile games, browsing, or any

such

habits. Sometimes, these habits might develop into healthy hobbies, but there are chances that they will suffer from a lot of personality disorders, communication problems, etc. if they spend more

time

by themselves only.

Hence

, I think it's healthier for a kid, to grow up with more family around them.

In addition

,

kids

who grew up with relatives and friends tend to be more flexible with sharing their own things. They develop sharing mentality from a very young age itself since they would not receive any special treatment

due to

the number of

people

in the family. More the

people

in a family, the more flexible they will become.

Also

, they will have more

people

to share their personal issues when they cannot share some uncomfortable things with their mother or father.

On the contrary

, one disadvantage is that they can become more distracted from their studies or ambition since they get only less

time

for their own hobbies or passions. In conclusion, I believe

kids

who grow up with more family around them have more advantages, but they have to make sure that they have enough

time

for their own passion and hobbies, and they don't lose their individuality.