A growing number of people feel that animal should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is a held view that using animality to satisfy people’s needs is inevitable,

however

Add a comma

however,

show examples

others suppose that

animals

should be treated in the same way humans are and have similar rights. Personally, I advocate the former view.

This

essay will examine both mentioned sides and choose an appropriate option. With regard to protecting

animals

’ rights, people assume it is essential to prevent their explosion for several reasons. First and foremost, excessive use of animal goods leads to their extinction, which causes a lack of ecosystems. If

animals

disappear from the Earth, vegetation would die out and the climate would

also

be extremely altered, since flora and fauna clean the oxygen.

For instance

,

due to

animal,experimentation 100-150 million vertebrates annually die in the

last

couple of decades.

Consequently

, if mankind continues to ignore the threat, a vast part of

animals

could

Verb problem

will

show examples

not survive and in the near ,future the planet

would

Wrong verb form

will

show examples

remain lifeless.

On the contrary

, society believes that it is acceptable to use

animals

for people’s targets at the expense of human well-being. Scientists have not developed any alternatives for animal testing , and

such

types of investigations are carried out of desperation. As an example related to laboratory research, it gives information to producers of medicine about product toxicity. Without holding examinations, some products can harm people’s health, which can be a reason for insoluble consequences. If

this

means experimenting on creatures so that we can fight and find cures for diseases,

then

this

takes priority over animal suffering.

To sum up

,

although

some people argue killing

animals

for research and food is unavoidable, I would argue there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that

this

is not the case, and,

therefore

, steps must be taken to improve the rights of

animals

.