The rising cost and decreasing supply of fossil fuels such as oil and gas along with environmental concerns, means that their continued use as our main source of energy is impractical and alternative sources must be found. The only realistic alternative is nuclear energy. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? Give reasons and relevant examples for your answer.

Nuclear

energy

is considered a replacement for fossil

fuels

due to

the supply is falling out and extremely costly

of

Change preposition

for

show examples

oil and gas since our prominent source of

energy

is not environmentally friendly.

While

I ardently believe that nuclear

energy

undeniably could be a quintessential substitution for fossil

fuels

although

usage of nuclear

energy

could give detrimental effects on the environment.

To begin

with, nuclear

energy

is comparably environmentally friendly to other secondary derivations of

energy

due to

the fact the construction of nuclear

power

plants requires less land than solar farms or wind farms, which minimizes the destruction of habitats in the area. On the flip side, the existence of nuclear

power

plants might potentially harm the ecosystem in the case of warm water released from the plants into the sea or river, which is unsuitable for aquatic life

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and may lead to death of the marine animals. All in all,

while

a nuclear

power

plant does take much less space than other type of

power

stations, it still has adverse effects on Mother Earth. Other than that, some

countries

may have a vast abundance of nuclear materials which can be advantageous to them since the government could utilize the materials to their convenience by manufacturing a plethora of nuclear

energy

.

Hence

,

this

gives the country a quintessential advantage over other regions that do not possess an equal amount of

power

. As a case in point,

countries

such

as Russia and The United States hold a high ranking globally

due to

their advanced nuclear technology. Despite that, these

countries

may easily be held accountable as aggressors if they were to misuse their

power

by developing nuclear weapons

as well as

initiating war against other

countries

; the world's tranquillity could vanish in a blink of an eye. In short, despite the idea that nuclear

energy

can be greatly beneficial to particular

countries

, it is irrefutable that the

power

imbalance between

countries

can effortlessly threaten world peace and harm the lives of many. As a gist, it is irrefutable that nuclear

energy

is a quintessential option to substitute the usage of non-renewable

energy

such

as fossil

fuels

.

However

, the adverse effects of nuclear

energy

undoubtedly outweigh the positive side of replacing fossil

fuels

with nuclear

energy

.

Hence

, the need for an effective safety policy to be implemented will address the proliferation of nuclear technologies.