Team activities can teach more skills to individual more than other activities ideally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Undoubtedly, a workforce of several individuals could improvise more skills and knowledge to people, rather than teaching separately.

Therefore

, it seems to me that partaking in group activities is far more beneficial for

overall

development and for that ,reason I would have to agree with

this

prospect.

To begin

with, if we talk about the human brain's ability to adopt knowledge from various perspectives,

then

we would all differ in terms of taking an ideal or group approach.

However

, the majority of students and people would put their reliance on gaining skills through community

work

, neither single-handedly.

In addition

,

this

workflow could turn out to be significantly excessive and effective in weather tough tasks or combining separate skill sets into one project.

For example

, we would have done plenty of projects in school,

whereas

we have found more comfortable in group

work

with various exciting ideas to execute and gain knowledge from it. Which

also

helps to obtain other abilities as well.

On the other hand

, there are many people out there who would prefer an individual mindset in their

work

, which is known as an ideal appearance.

For instance

, a singular force could put more disadvantageous problems than teamwork, where a single person should have to rely on themselves.

Although

, team members could use divide and rule their

work

into parts based on personal experience.

As a result

, not only ideal approach reflect difficult achievements achievable but

also

it can test our capabilities too.

To sum up

, many would find comfortable alone in their own space, but a combined task force can teach expertise and other aspects. From that given argument, both of the ways can reflect many outcomes either negative or positive.