Some believe buildings should be built in a way that serves their purpose rather than just look beautiful. Others, however, say buildings should represent art too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Undoubtedly, the infrastructure of

buildings

should serve the purpose of its strength neither the appearance.

Therefore

, some would believe that exterior and outdoor structures display their uniqueness.

This

essay will examine both of the prospects of

this

argument and I will portray my opinion too.

To begin

with, some individuals have thought of

buildings

should be established to serve their presentness and strength in the interior portion rather than the outdoor appearance.

However

, many of us would convince with

this

perspective that, huge skyscrapers are made for housing facilities in clustered populated areas, which can reflect its purpose.

For example

, simple and effective infrastructure would minimise several problems,

whereas

excessive exterior design will only portray significant art.

In addition

, the budget would

also

have to compromise for safety and other features just for the artwork. But complications will be more than just looking beautiful.

On the other hand

, somewhere outdoor designs of the

buildings

are sued for their attraction. Many

buildings

and sculptures around the globe are known for their uniqueness,

whereas

it would

also

serve inbuilt infrastructure too.

For instance

, Dubai’s great Burj khalifa has beautifully appeared for its strength and stalest skyscraper in the world.

Furthermore

, It was

also

developed by consideration in determining other factors

such

as accommodation, hotels, amenities for the public and more. As a result, today it is serving both of the prospects of

this

phenomenon.

To sum up

, humans

also

organised themselves by their persona, smilier goes with building too without the design it will look minimalist. In my opinion, both of these features should be considered vital for the development of any building.