Some people think that the government's decision to close the land borders in order to boost local production is a great idea. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this decision? What alternative decisions could have been used to boost local production?

The productivity of a country is one of the most important factors to maintain a good economic status.

However

, with the advent of the liberalization of the market, the price of

products

changes a lot depending on the worldwide economy.

For

this

reason, somebody believes that closing borders between

countries

could help to improve local production. In

this

essay, I will explain which are the advantages and disadvantages of

this

tendency and I will propose an alternative way of solving the problem. On one hand, the decision to close borders could affect positively the

quality

of final

products

. As a matter of fact,

overall

in the food market, fewer kilometres between producer and consumer means better

quality

.

For instance

, maintaining fruits and vegetables during transport between

countries

is possible using methods like freezing,

as a result

of bad

quality

of the final product.

On the other hand

, the limitation between

countries

could involve a big waste of

products

. Sometimes happens that the consumption of a country is not enough.

For

this

reason, the product expires.

For instance

, a lot of Italian regions are famous for the production of tomatoes.

However

, the Italian market is too little to consume all the

products

resulting in a big waste. In conclusion,

overall

focusing on agriculture production the closure of borders could improve the

quality

of goods, but it might

also

create a problem of waste. A good alternative politics could be to put a limit on the kilometres between

countries

that exchange goods in order to maintain the

quality

and avoid wasting.