The most importamt aim of science should be to improve people's life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Advancement in

science

has affected every aspect of human

life

.

Although

some believe that it is

science

's responsibility to promote our quality of

life

, others are against

this

point of view. In

this

essay, I will discuss why I disagree with

this

opinion owing the following reasons: Those in favour of utilizing

science

in a way to enhance people's comfort believe that human beings should be the priority in every field. They see

this

universe as materialistic and other species exist to serve them whatever they desire. To illustrate, these individuals invade the environment in order to meet their needs without considering its negative consequences.

For example

, the public living during the industrial revolution period started using all resources to have a better

life

which caused air pollution and endangered other crops and animals.

On the other hand

, others believe that

science

is responsible in front of other species and should protect the earth from being destroyed.

In addition

, despite the fact that human is known as an owner of

this

planet and their reliance on other creatures to be alive, they do not take care of their home, the Earth.

Therefore

, innovations and discoveries that are conducted should consider their possible effects from financial to environmental.

For instance

,

although

nuclear weapons can elevate humans' lives, they can

also

endanger both humans and other groups.

To sum up

, based on the reasons cited above, I would like to disagree with the statement. People should change their attitudes toward

science

and technology to render the best services at every price because

this

idea definitely would threaten the planet and its inhabitants. It is the government's mission to encourage individuals to balance their standards of living by deep thought about other aspects of

life

.