A government has a responsibility to its citizen to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defence but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree?

Natural

disasters

are calamities that cannot be predicted in advance. In

this

essay, it will be observed whether I agree or disagree with the opinion that the

State

should protect the lives of its people from natural

disasters

. First and foremost, İn

this

day and age , the number of natural

disasters

has increased. Let's talk about the aspects that I agree with that it is the duty of the

state

to insure the lives of its citizens.

For example

, these include the 2023 earthquake in Hatay, Turkey, and the 2022 forest fires in Antalya, Turkey. The reasons for these

disasters

can be attributed to the responsibility of the

state

. The biggest example of the

state

's failure to control its construction is that almost no buildings survived the Hatay earthquake.

Also

, it is normal for forests to catch

fire

on a hot summer day because the dryness value of the air is not measured in the

fire

areas.

Also

, it is normal for forests to catch

fire

on a hot summer day because the dryness value of the air is not measured in the

fire

areas. In the absence of

such

controls, it is impossible to talk about the safety of people's lives²⁰⁰. Second of all, We talked about why I agree above. Now let's see why I disagree with

this

idea. Everyone should be aware of all the

rules

for their own safety.

For instance

, these

rules

include requiring an earthquake-proof certificate of the apartment before buying an apartment in the building or requiring a certificate of the area where the building is built.

As a result

,The

state

should control some

rules

, but people should know the

rules

and protect their lives as much as they can.