Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

One of the global problems contains aspects that potentially make many

languages

disappear, nowadays we have many

languages

that are used by very small numbers. Some people think that for solving

this

problem

governments should spend public

money

on saving these

languages

,

while

others believe that would be a waste of

money

. Let’s consider both of these views. On the one hand, we can see the case where these rare

languages

are saving the tendency of slowly dying

while

governments do not do anything with

this

situation. In

this

case, we can lose a piece of culture that includes,

for example

, literature or traditional celebrations.

Therefore

, in the

past

Add a comma

,past

show examples

we had many colonized countries, which is why many African countries nowadays are English-speaking and French-speaking. The same situation is in Eastern Europe: because of

Soviet’s

Change noun form

Soviet

show examples

colonization many non-Russian-speaking countries have the biggest part that can speak and understand Russian. I believe that

this

is not normal; Latvians should speak Latvian, Ukrainians should speak Ukrainian, Kenyans should speak Swahili etc.

That is

why the government should spend public

money

on saving national

languages

, we have to try for saving our historical

languages

.

On the other hand

, we can meet many financial problems because of spending the biggest part of public

money

for solving

this

problem

, but in any case, I think that politics can find the cheaper way for it.

Also

, we should not forget about giving a choice to citizens, perhaps some prefer speaking a different language, their native language not their cup of tea. We

also

should consider and advantages of

this

opinion too, a knowledge of French,

for example

in Kongo, can give Kongo’s population an opportunity to move to France. It can help in cases where there are no universities in the country that can teach neurosurgery, but in France they are, and Kongo’s applicants can not learn French from the beginning.

Therefore

, in ,France many immigrants from Africa and I believe that they are satisfied with their new lifestyle, and they have a better level of life than they had in their hometowns.

Finally

, I can say that saving rare

languages

is our duty, but sometimes solving

this

problem

can be not that useful. It does not mean that we can forget about it. We have to deal with

this

problem

within reason.