Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?

With the improvement of

tourism

and globalisation, most

tourism

agencies are organizing tours to the countryside these days. Some people believe that

this

tourism

activity helps to develop in rural areas opportunities which

locals

have,

while

others think that the reverse is true.

This

has some positive impacts on the local people, but I think the detrimental

effects

Correct your spelling

effects

show examples

on the environment are more significant and that the issue is more of a negative development. First of all, the environment in the countryside hosts various kinds of animals,

such

as birds, fish etc.

According to

scientific reports, many types of fish are affected in a negative way during the

tourism

season.

For example

, the population of salmon in the ocean dramatically decreased, after the number of tours increased in Iceland.

Thus

, tourists should care for and respect the life condition of local and endangered species of animals. In regard to, people who live in rural areas have limited chances about their life conditions.

For instance

, the amount of food depends on the weather condition,

additionally

, after a hard winter season the amount of harvested crops is just enough only local

peoples

Change noun form

people's

show examples

eating habits. During the tour season,

locals

couldn't answer the demand of tourists. Because of

this

,

tourism

agencies ought to access fresh information about local life. So,

to sum up

, it is clear to say that,

tourism

is one the most important income sources for the

locals

.

However

, especially in

dangered

Correct your spelling

endangered

show examples

situations, the government and

locals

should cooperate together to protect their natural environment. I think that the negative environmental consequences that

this

situation brings are far more significant.