Some people in developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibility towards protecting the environment. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

A highly controversial issue today relates to the responsibility to take action against climate change is greater for developed countries than developing countries.And there are those who advocate for equal environmental responsibility among nations.In

this

,essay I am going to examine from both points of view and

then

give my opinion on the matter. On one side of the argument there are people who argue that it is essential for every mankind around the world should understand the importance of saving nature in every possible way.The main reason for believing

this

is that mankind is united and the mistake of one will be suffered by all.It is

also

possible to say that no individual nation single-handedly can make changes.One good illustration of

this

is planting more trees in each part of the world has made a visible difference and gradually the pollution is reducing.

On the other hand

,it is

also

possible to make an opposing case.It is often argued that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

the fact it is the only duty of the leading nations that have more money and manpower will only fight against global heating as underdeveloped will fail in support.People often have

this

opinion because they assume that the countries with great power are generally the destroyer and

hence

it's their role to battle the situation.A particularly good example here is the less developed states will not have enough resources that can help in saving mother earth. In conclusion,I believe both arguments have their merits.On balance,

however

,I feel that every individual representative can make a difference.

This

is because , like destroying the beautiful land everybody is liable

likewise

saving it for the future is

also

a pragmatic deed.