Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays many

countries

have faced a

problem

in terms of finance

while

some

countries

are on their way up to be rich in every aspect. Some people believe that to help the poorer

countries

the richer

countries

should help them by providing financial aid.

thus

, Some suggest that they should give other types of help. The following paragraphs will be discussed in detail.

Although

It is true that the poorer

countries

will have more

money

to drive the finance in their market after they got the financial aid. Yet, it will only solve the

problem

for a short period of time, after they run out of

money

they will back to that crisis again if they don’t know how to manage it in the right way.

Moreover

, It seems like

this

type of

problem

-solving doesn’t work properly on a pain point, to help them remain sustainable in terms of finances might need to find a way that they can do it by themselves in the long term.

for instance

,

provided

Wrong verb form

providing

show examples

their knowledge about how to gain an income for their

countries

by promoting their uniqueness, it could be their culture, food, history and many more.

On the other hand

, it can be said that giving poorer

countries

money

can boost their financial

problem

in the short term. Yet, it still provides an income to the

countries

to run the amounts of

money

around their

countries

rather than freeze the

money

to stick in the same stage. In conclusion, I personally believe that providing the poorer country with other types of help might benefit their financial

problem

in the long term rather than a short period of time with financial aid.