Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for country development and progress. To what extent do you agree or not agree?

How to allocate the government’s expenditure has long been a highly charged issue.
While
it is believed that there should be an increase in state funds for imparting science-related knowledge, I would argue that other
subjects
are of similar significance in the progression of a
nation
. On the one hand, placing a premium on science
subjects
like mathematics and physics is conducive to the growth of a
nation
. It stands to reason that the more researchers or engineers a country has, the greater their contribution to the prosperity of a society. To illustrate, with billions of dollars spent on scientific research and relevant leaching activities, America has accomplished a number of breakthroughs in road networks, biotechnology and space exploration.
Therefore
, it is safe
to conclude
that stressing the role of science
subjects
in the education system would have a far-reaching long-term impact on a
nation
.
On the other hand
, I believe that liberal arts education including literature and law has an equally important role to play in the sustainable growth of a
nation
. It is widely acknowledged that a society characterized by citizens well-cultivated and knowledgeable in literature or arts tends to enjoy a higher moral standard and social stability. Specifically, law-abiding and productive citizens tend to adopt a decent code of conduct and commit fewer crimes, leading to better social security and improved living standards. As an expected outcome, government funding of social sciences would help individuals alter their intrinsic values and do their utmost to become productive members of society. In conclusion,
subjects
related to social sciences
such
as literature and law have as much impact and significance on the development and progress of one’s
nation
and deserve as much government investment as science
subjects
.
Submitted by lamminhhuy78 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: